Do UNISON members have anything to say about the cuts?

  • Ray Oldroyd
Posted: Fri, 22/10/2010 - 14:02
I'm a bit surprised that having heard the outcomes of the comprehensive spending review, and the impact it will have on our jobs & council services, members don't have any views. Is it fair that we bear the costs of bailing out the bankers? I say make them pay! 

Proposed cuts

  • timfearon
  • 01/03/11
  • Wed, 19/01/2011 - 20:52

Sadly the predominant view I get is that everyone feels that it is not worth doing anything as they feel the council will just do what they want. This is not my view but it is exhausting trying to argue against it all the time.
We need to make this campaign much more positive. When one is arguing against such savage cuts, those looking on will say "what are the alternatives", and I don't feel the alternatives are being pushed nearly forcefully enough, either by the trade unions or our representatives in parliament. As well as Unison's efforts to push the council on early retirement and voluntary redundancy, we should all be urging the government to introduce (and encourage the global community to introduce) what is popularly known as a "Robin Hood Tax" (http://robinhoodtax.org/). This would be a tiny tax of about 0.05% on transactions like stocks, bonds, foreign currency and derivatives between banks, paid for by the banks, which could raise £250 billion a year globally, or £20 billion in the UK alone. This could be introduced, as well as a tax on excess profits and bonuses. We live in a morally bankrupt society when one individual can earn millions of pounds, so another proposal I would like to see introduced is that no person in an organisation should be paid more than ten times what the lowest paid receives. There has also been a government focus on benefit fraud (I have seen a figure saying this costs about £1 billion a year) but precious little from anyone about the much larger amounts (?£20 Billion +) lost through tax evasion and avoidance. These are all positive things we should be shouting from the rooftops.
I do feel that, if people are given a positive alternative to argue for (and see the money these measures could raise) it may just reinforce the great injustices they are being subjected to and encourage them that there is something to campaign for.

Robin Hood Tax

  • Ray Oldroyd
  • 01/26/10
  • Mon, 24/01/2011 - 10:18
Tim
UNISON fully supports your views on the need to introduce a Robin Hood tax on bank transactions. It forms part of UNISON's alternative budget proposals and is a key strategy in our Million Voices for Public Services Campaign
Locally we are organising free transport to the TUC London March for the Alternative on the 26th March 2011. Details will be distributed shortly, and if any members are interested in attending, please contact the Branch Office for details of free coach travel.
 
Thousands of people will join the TUC march in London on the 26th March to tell the government that savage spending cuts are unnecessary and unfair. There is an alternative that includes fair taxation, investment in local communities, health & education and a more equal and just society for all.
 
 

Cuts

  • Jane Nightingale
  • 03/12/10
  • Thu, 28/10/2010 - 23:19

I am surprised that there have been no comments posted so far. I would thought that this would have been crammed full of comments and thoughts of what we can do.

The Authority wastes so much on trivial things and now they are intending to impose a 5% paycut?
The clearout should start at the top and then go down the structures. We must make sure that when Managers loose staff, Locations and how many their section, department has been reduced by, they should be re-evaluated.

Sell a couple of Cars along with the Registration plates

All Councillors should : Use the buses more, travel Standard Class, no payments from the coffers to subsidise Civic functions and duties.

No away day conferences use the facilities we have.

Cut PAY at Executive levels

There are many more things that they can do rather than make the Lower Paid staff poorer.

Should they wish to look at a 5% paycut this should only applied to Grades higher than Grade 7.

I too im surprised to see

  • Liam Roddis
  • 03/12/10
  • Mon, 25/10/2010 - 19:58

I too im surprised to see that no one has resonded to your comment Ray.
is it that no one cares about there jobs and there roles in this town,are we to just allow the council to impose all these cuts and attempt to change are terms and conditions without the slightest fight,what will it take for us to stand up and be counteded,if we allow these cuts to go a head theres no reason for the council to turn around next year and tell us that we still need to make cuts to are terms and conditions,we just simply cannot allow this to happen.
we need to say NO we will not allow this to happen.

job cuts

  • totenham
  • 03/17/10
  • Sun, 28/11/2010 - 12:29

i have to agree it is a little surprising.i think a lot of emplyees are only just getting their heads around how hard the cuts are..on our dept NEIGHBOURHOOD PRIDE they are looking for 31 job losses in the first year of which they have a total of 29 volunteers,why are these volunteers not bein allowed to leave as soon as possible,because if they are not allowed to leave for what ever reason it means employees will be made compulsary redundant, something mister houghton sats he wants to avoid. i think one of the reasons why, may- be area managers wanting to choose which employees they want to leave!. as for strike action how many can really afford to lose any money at all in the prescent climate,more so on our dept where a lot of the work is considered non essensial i.e.grasscutting. volunteers from any dept should be allowed to go to save compulsary redundencies.